Requirements for executives (2016)

Sold 0
Refunds 0
Good feedbacks 0
Bad feedbacks 0

Requirements for executive documents (2016)

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Introduction 3
1 General provisions on enforcement documents 5
1.1 the Concept and types of executive documents 5
1.2 the timing of the presentation of executive documents for execution 12
2 Compliance with the requirements for the executive documents 18
2.1 General requirements for executive documents 18
2.2 Particular requirements for executive documents 23
Conclusion 31
References used 33

LIST OF USED SOURCES

I. Normative legal acts and other official documents

1. The Family Code of the Russian Federation of December 29, 1995 No. 223-FZ (as amended on July 13, 2015 No. 240-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. № 1, p. sixteen.
2. Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation dated July 24, 2002 No. 95-FZ (as amended on December 30, 2015 No. 425-FZ) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. № 30, p. 3012.
3. Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of November 14, 2002 No. 138-ФЗ (as amended on December 30, 2015 No. 425-ФЗ) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. No. 46, Art. 4532.
4. Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation of March 8, 2015 No. 21-FZ (as amended on December 30, 2015 No. 425-ФЗ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2015. № 10, p. 1391.
5. Federal Law of the Russian Federation of October 2, 2007 No. 229-FZ “On Enforcement Proceedings” (as amended on November 28, 2015 No. 340-FZ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2007. № 41, p. 4849.
6. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 8, 1997 No. 828 “On Approval of the Regulations on the Passport of a Citizen of the Russian Federation, Sample of a Form and Description of a Passport of a Citizen of the Russian Federation” (as amended on June 23, 2014 No. 581) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation . 1997. No. 28, Art. 3444.

Ii. Practice materials

1. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of July 1, 1996 No. 6/8 “On some issues related to the application of the first part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation” (as amended on June 23, 2015 No. 25) // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 1996. № 9.
2. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of February 10, 2009 No. 2 “On the practice of the courts hearing cases challenging decisions, actions (inaction) of state authorities, local governments, officials, state and municipal employees” (as amended by 9 February 2012 No. 3) // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 2009. № 4.
3. The decision of the Kotovsky District Court of the Volgograd Region of November 27, 2013 in case No. 2-1017 / 2013 [Electronic resource]: URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/fZZYm4S6EZUQ/ (appeal date: 01/20/2016 ).
4. The decision of the Moscow District Court of Kaliningrad, Kaliningrad Region of April 25, 2013 in case No. 2-1694 / 2013 [Electronic resource]: URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ZL2rHFY2HLL1/ (appeal date: 01.23.2016).
5. The decision of the Pyatigorsk City Court of the Stavropol Territory of November 17, 2014 in case No. 2-4608 / 2014 [Electronic resource]: URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/CUKjqTIkNCxS/ (appeal date: 24.01.2016 ).
6. The decision of the Stavropol District Court of the Samara Region of August 1, 2013 in case No. 2-1794 / 13 [Electronic resource]: URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/qLjwrn7BysgC/ (appeal date: 01/23/2016 ).
7. Decision of the Central District Court of Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Region, dated November 26, 2015, in case No. 2A-6022/2015 [Electronic resource]: URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/7cyo09ar6Zlj/ (appeal date: 01/21/2016).
8. The decision of the Chernovskiy District Court of the city of Chita of March 10, 2015 in case No. 2-799 / 2015 [Electronic resourc
Remember that any ready-made work needs to be finalized and can not be used as an end-product. The work was done in WORD format in accordance with GOST.