December 10th about 10 o'clock in the morning in the central police station (2013)
Sold 0
Refunds 0
Good feedbacks 0
Bad feedbacks 0
Target 12 - 2
December 10th about 10 o'clock in the morning in the central police station in Omsk an oral statement about the murder of his son appealed Noses. The applicant stated that on 7 December, the 19-year-old son Anton, who worked as a loader at the elevator, and resigned from his job with the head of the warehouse of the same elevator Kiselyov and their common neighbor Plekhanov went to the left-bank part of the city. December 10 Kiselev returned home alone. As the relationship of the applicant had been hostile to him, for a son he did not ask. Referring to the information received from the husband of Plekhanov, the applicant stated that on returning home Kiseleva it saw a belt and coat belonging to her son, and that the latter, apparently killed because he knew about the "criminal fraud" Kiselyov grain.
Expand the remedial order receiving oral statement? Is oral statement Nosov grounds for instituting criminal proceedings? What should be the reaction of the official (or body) adopted a statement. Is there a basis for initiating a criminal case? Who and what action should be taken?
Task 14 - 2
Upon arriving to the crime scene investigation into the murder, the investigator found out that the situation at the crime scene at the time of inspection subject to change. In particular, the corpse of the victim's relatives was moved to another room, and the traces of blood on the floor and walls are washed away.
Identify the persons watching the first scene shortly after the incident, the investigator drew them to participate in the examination by rasprosov clarify the situation, which they saw, and he brought this information to the protocol inspection of the scene.
Rate the correct actions of the investigator.
Expand the remedial order production inspection of the scene.
Task 21 - 3
During the trial the defendant exercised defender audio recording process, and a relative of the defendant, who was in the courtroom, at the request of a lawyer led video. Who were in the courtroom student interns conducted periodically photographing composition of the court and other participants in the process and of itself. The bailiff asked the students to stop photographing, but they did not obey his demands. Defender and relatives of the defendants, the presiding warned about the need to stop the audio and video recording is also ignored the orders of the presiding and the defendant began to shout insults at the court.
Who and what records can lead in the hearing? It allowed photography, audio and video course of the trial? What measures and for any violations shall apply to those present in the courtroom, to counsel, to the prosecutor, the defendant?
Task 26 - 4
Nikolaev, Tikhonov and Petrov were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. From convicts only Nikolayev appealed, which did not contest the findings of the Court of proof of guilt, and the qualification of the offense and asked to commute the sentence. His request, he explained nothing. The judge refused to accept the complaint on the grounds that the request for a commutation of sentence is necessary to motivate. Nikolaev supplemented the complaint and pointed out that the Court of First Instance did not consider the mitigating circumstances: the marital status and the positive response from the last job.
In considering the case on appeal, the court only checked compliance of the punishment of the convicted person and the severity of the offense. The question of the validity of the conviction Nikolaev, Petrova and Tikhonov was not discussed, as Nikolaev verdict in this part is not disputed, and Tikhonov and Peter did not file an appeal.
Does the law require that the appeals were motivated? Are the actions of the court of cassation?
December 10th about 10 o'clock in the morning in the central police station in Omsk an oral statement about the murder of his son appealed Noses. The applicant stated that on 7 December, the 19-year-old son Anton, who worked as a loader at the elevator, and resigned from his job with the head of the warehouse of the same elevator Kiselyov and their common neighbor Plekhanov went to the left-bank part of the city. December 10 Kiselev returned home alone. As the relationship of the applicant had been hostile to him, for a son he did not ask. Referring to the information received from the husband of Plekhanov, the applicant stated that on returning home Kiseleva it saw a belt and coat belonging to her son, and that the latter, apparently killed because he knew about the "criminal fraud" Kiselyov grain.
Expand the remedial order receiving oral statement? Is oral statement Nosov grounds for instituting criminal proceedings? What should be the reaction of the official (or body) adopted a statement. Is there a basis for initiating a criminal case? Who and what action should be taken?
Task 14 - 2
Upon arriving to the crime scene investigation into the murder, the investigator found out that the situation at the crime scene at the time of inspection subject to change. In particular, the corpse of the victim's relatives was moved to another room, and the traces of blood on the floor and walls are washed away.
Identify the persons watching the first scene shortly after the incident, the investigator drew them to participate in the examination by rasprosov clarify the situation, which they saw, and he brought this information to the protocol inspection of the scene.
Rate the correct actions of the investigator.
Expand the remedial order production inspection of the scene.
Task 21 - 3
During the trial the defendant exercised defender audio recording process, and a relative of the defendant, who was in the courtroom, at the request of a lawyer led video. Who were in the courtroom student interns conducted periodically photographing composition of the court and other participants in the process and of itself. The bailiff asked the students to stop photographing, but they did not obey his demands. Defender and relatives of the defendants, the presiding warned about the need to stop the audio and video recording is also ignored the orders of the presiding and the defendant began to shout insults at the court.
Who and what records can lead in the hearing? It allowed photography, audio and video course of the trial? What measures and for any violations shall apply to those present in the courtroom, to counsel, to the prosecutor, the defendant?
Task 26 - 4
Nikolaev, Tikhonov and Petrov were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. From convicts only Nikolayev appealed, which did not contest the findings of the Court of proof of guilt, and the qualification of the offense and asked to commute the sentence. His request, he explained nothing. The judge refused to accept the complaint on the grounds that the request for a commutation of sentence is necessary to motivate. Nikolaev supplemented the complaint and pointed out that the Court of First Instance did not consider the mitigating circumstances: the marital status and the positive response from the last job.
In considering the case on appeal, the court only checked compliance of the punishment of the convicted person and the severity of the offense. The question of the validity of the conviction Nikolaev, Petrova and Tikhonov was not discussed, as Nikolaev verdict in this part is not disputed, and Tikhonov and Peter did not file an appeal.
Does the law require that the appeals were motivated? Are the actions of the court of cassation?
Remember that any finished work needs work and can not be used as a final product.